I made this video using ezvid:
A copyright troll gobbled up my video:
Copyright trolls are bad, mmmkay?
PLEASE BE SURE TO TELL THE CREATOR OF EZVID THAT YOU DO NOT APPROVE OF THEIR SUPPORTING COPYRIGHT TROLLS!
made with ezvid http://ezvid.com
ezvid’s blatant half-truth:
“We want to be clear that the music is 100% pre-cleared for YouTube — … and although it’s possible that you will get a notification from YouTube (a “matched third party” content notice)_, you should note that the notification is a *friendly* one…. unlike notifications from companies like Warner Music, Universal Music Group, and other nasty companies who don’t respect the rights of users to use music for free on youtube…”
http://www.ezvid.com/youtube_copyright_notice_with_ezvid
“friendly” as in, thanks for adding your creation to OUR collection, dumbass.
In order to make this video creative commons using ezvid software, you have to select this annoying hiss audio track in the background called “Silent Machine”. Why in teh F would they not include a “no music track” selection?
My submission to the NATOarts video collection:
Drones in the USA – SkyNET ALERT! – Attack of the Robots – 10-02-2012 CV3D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKY1nq3se4E
Copyright troll is a pejorative term for a party that enforces copyrights it owns for purposes of making money through litigation, in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic, generally without producing or licensing the works it owns for paid distribution. Critics object to the activity because they believe it does not encourage the production of creative works, instead it makes money from the inequities and unintended consequences of high statutory damages provisions in copyright laws intended to encourage creation of such works.[1]
The term for and conception of a copyright troll began to appear in the mid-2000s. It derives from “patent trolls”, which are companies that enforce patent rights to earn money from companies that are selling products, without having products of their own for sale.[2] It is distinguished from holders of large copyright portfolios, such as ASCAP’s music licensing operation, who acquire copyrights in order to license and distribute them for a profit.[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_troll
YouTube Upgrades its Takedown Challenge Procedure for ContentID-Triggered Video Removal
https://www.chillingeffects.org/weather.cgi?WeatherID=661
Robots Mistakenly Take Down Livestreams
“”There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission.”
Would-be viewers of the livestream for the 2012 Hugo awards or of Michelle Obama’s speech at the Democratic National Convention could have been forgiven for thinking they had somehow stumbled upon an episode of the old 1960′s sci-fi thriller show The Outer Limits,, with its assertion of total control of the viewers’ television.
Viewers of the 2012 Hugo Awards ceremony were enjoying a speech from celebrity author Neil Gaiman when they saw “”Worldcon banned due to copyright infringement”, and the stream ended. DNC viewers saw this message.
“This video contains content from WMG, SME, Associated Press (AP), UMG, Dow Jones, New York Times Digital, The Harry Fox Agency, Inc. (HFA), Warner Chappell, UMPG Publishing and EMI Music Publishing, one or more of whom have blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.”
http://chillingeffects.org/weather.cgi?WeatherID=658
EFF.org Copyright Trolls
https://www.eff.org/issues/copyright-trolls
Judge Boylson wants to test copyright trolls’ evidence in a bellwether trial 10-07-2012
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2012/10/07/judge-boylson-wants-to-test-copyright-trolls-evidence-in-a-bellwether-trial/
Attorneys who defend troll victims
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/resources/
Copyright Trolls by ConsumersHeldHostage.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsC5RwPCtpo
NOTE: Consumersheldhostage.org has been deleted?
http://web.archive.org/web/20110627225948/http://consumersheldhostage.org/
https://www.facebook.com/ConsumersHeldHostage
Top 10 Takedowns in Google’s Copyright Transparency Report
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/07/top-10-takedowns-googles-copyright-transparency-report
PS. I personally liked the music track, the annoying part is the fact that I can’t choose “no audio track”.
Why can’t we choose “no audio track” ? This is a feature that should come with this software. It’s good to avoid having problems with YouTube.
Bests,
João Flávio de Freitas Almeida
This is such a fucking useless software..
All I wanted was a software that will allow me to add a watermark without fucking up the quality of my 1080P recorded videos.
EZVID was perfect for that.
But then they go and fuck it up big time by removing the god damn fucking original recorded audio of people speaking and replacing is fucking bullshit generic background music.
Honestly what the fuck were you guys thinking? I wasted to much time trying to figure out how to remove the fucking music and get back my original audio.
Fucking useless!!!! Waste of fucking time, person who decides “oh! let’s delete their audio and replace it with shitty music” should be fucking MURDERED!
FUCK!
yeah its shit for sure, i thought it was just marketing where they said “best free editor for youtube videos” but its actually useless for anything but youtube. and still pretty useless even then
but you can turn off their retarded forced music selections
all i did was go here
C:\Program Files (x86)\ezvid\songs
and copy the name of one of the songs, like 156timefreeze.wma
went back one to C:\Program Files (x86)\ezvid\
renamed EULA.txt to 156timefreeze.wma
put it in the songs folder
and selected timefreeze for my forced song… beautiful silence…
hope that helps another poor soul who got tricked into downloading this piece of shit, which installs 4 other spyware pieces of shit
DONT DOWNLOAD EZVID